Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

Economic index, consumption and unemployment rate

Tuesday, November 30th, 2010

From 2009 to 2010, Obama and his economists promoted stimulate package to raise employment rate. They give a few hundred billion dollars bail out to different kind of consumers and the unemployment rate was still at about 9% in the end of 2010. They simply believe that when merchandises were sold from the stores jobs will be increased in the market.
Please see how the Chinese economists consider unemployment issues. Around 2002, the labor cost in China was 3% to 5% of Japan and was 10% to 20% of Korea and Taiwan. 60% of their labors finished high school. The labor’s salary rate and quality gave them good advantage to attract foreign investments. However they still had a careful research about their job market. They found out that from 1999 to 2002 their economic increased 7% up each year and the unemployment was increased from 3.1% to 4%. They concluded that economic index increasing didn’t mean that employment would increase. The reason was that the high tech and modern equipments might give economic a big development but could not provide jobs as we expected.
They also noticed that jobs demanding usually were growth faster than jobs supply. Every year they could only create 7- 9 million jobs but the new job demanding are twenty to twenty- two million a year. They had a conclusion that for the stable of their society they need to have different kind of business structures that forms a shape of pyramids. They not only develop high tech but keep businesses that require labors. They even consider what should be their priority goal: developing economic or maintaining jobs.
Our economists, those teach in the top university of the world and those received Nobel price never make this kind of contemplates. They close their eyes to promote a one hundred year old economic theory. They tell people that when consumption goes up employment rate will go up. They don’t care that in the age of free trade we lost the control to our businesses and manufactures – the important chain connecting merchandise market and jobs market.
I once posted my comment in Paul Krugman’s blog discussing his consuming philosophy. I said this was the situation:
Base on scientists’ prediction, steam catching cold weather in the sky will turn to be rain. We desperate need rain. Our economists tell us to put the last water we have under the sunshine – turn that water to be steam and hope that the steam will become rain one day. They don’t care the rain will fall down at when and on where and they don’t mind that things they use to catch the rain have a big hole.
All these years our economists try to set a formula like Newton’s speed x time = distance. They believe that having a formula to explain every situation economic will be sure considered science. They try to be the leaders of our society. However, when things collapse they will walk away. They will say things collapse because people lose their trust to politicians. So that is a political issue not economic issue.
I am so harsh to the misleading they created because they made our president who is not smart enough to spent huge money to stimulate the consumption. They make the American suffer from another big lost after losing huge money in the wars of anti-terrorism and we cannot offer to take that kind of lost anymore.

Diabetes and Health Insurance Cost

Friday, November 26th, 2010

Data shows in America 10% of health insurance is paid for diabetes treatments. The average medical cost of regular people is about $4,700 per year. However, the average cost for diabetic was over $11,000. Such a big difference caught my attention because in my mind we have no medicine to cure diabetes up to today. So under what kind of circumstance money was spent.

Beside genetic weaknesses reason of diabetes usually is related to the food we eat. Overeat, particular over eat too much sugar and starch can cause diabetes. If we control our diet and do more exercises diabetes can be improved. We might not cured full of it but we can at least keep our body’s function.

In another word the only person who can help diabetics are patients themselves. If they eat right they can hang there without cost that much health insurance fund. If they don’t control their diet that means they don’t care about their health. There for they are not deserve to be helped by health insurance fund. Either way let diabetics have unlimited treatment is not appropriately.

Set up health insurance quota is very important in case like this. Diabetics will control their diet carefully for their quota can be used up. They might give up treatments that are without curing effects. Right now we let them spend funds in the way they want to spend. It looks like it would be their lost if insurance companies are willing to pay the doctor fee and they don’t see the doctors. Doctors of course hope to collect as much money as they can. In the picture our doors are wide opened and real money, dollars by dollars, are being paid to so call diabetes treatments that actually have no curing effect.

Doctors usually recommend their patients to take the most expenses service. One of my friends told me that many years ago he had diabetes. Doctors convinced him to cut his leg or he would have troubles. He refused to do it no matter what. His legs carry him around for more 10 years after that. He was fine till the day he talked to me. He said he cannot imagine what kind of life quality he would have if he lost his leg.

It is said there is 15 million diabetics in the United States and another thirty to fifty million people are pre-diabetics. If every year each of them spent $6,000 more health insurance than the regular people the total extra cost will be 400 billion dollars. If in average they have diabetes for 10 years the total extra cost will be 4 trillion dollars. For that huge amount of money we have reason to reevaluate our insurance policies or our economic will collapse because the overload of our insurance premiums.

People might say I talking all these because my health is good. Actually my blood sugar is higher than normal as well and I did not control diet as what I suppose to do. However, I still believe it is no body else but my duty to take care of my health. We have no right to enjoy food and let the society take care of our obese.

Molester, Pervert, disgusting

Thursday, November 25th, 2010

According to the report in AM New York molester, pervert, and disgusting were the words that TSA screeners hear the most in their job area. For preventing the attacks from terrorist airport give full-body scans to all the air travelers. They physically search those who refused to be scanned and told the passengers that: You fight, you wait.

The new scanners can see through people’s body. Businessmen immediately invented special underwear and claimed that can protect peoples’ privacy. In the procedures a cancer survivor was covered in urine and a woman’s fake breast was taken off. This is a picture about our achievement as anti- terrorists. After losing all those soldiers’ lives and a half trillion dollars in the wars we don’t feel security in our homeland. That is why people were upset and refused to be scanned.

Just by taking a look we can tell that 99% of the passengers are not terrorists. However, we search them for the security reason. Terrorists sent out one more bomb we enforce our security procedures more by searching air travelers. Terrorists must have fun to see how Americans are raising their hands and being scanned. It proofs that their parcel bomb, fake bomb are powerful. Just by making a phone call they can give us a nightmare forever. If they choose the subway as their target we can’t stop them by scanning subway passengers. They can do many more things to hurt us if they want to.

Ten years of war cannot stop their attacks. It looks like the best way to stop them is to negotiate with them. From the beginning I believe that eliminating terrorists is not the way to solve the problem because they are backed up by religion and we cannot kill all of the Muslims disciples. Negotiation with them is not that impossible. The loss that the Japanese created in Pearl Harbor was much serious than what we lost in 9.11 and we work in alliance with them today. The Vietnam government fighting with us for many years. Ben Laden and Saddam Hussein once were our friends. Asking for negotiation might hurt our dignity. Thinking about how we once hurt their dignity we can balance ourselves. Tell them forget about what we have done and end the conflicts. In today’s day the natural disasters give mankind enough troubles we have no reason to fight each other and make our life tough.

By showing our sincerity we can release the terrorists in our jails. Terrorists have faith just like we have faith. Every time I read their faces I feel that they are not crazy. They are the people who can sit down with us and have a talk. If we don’t do things they do like they wouldn’t fight. We can tell Israel to stay in where the United Nations said they should stay at the time they set up their country. If they don’t listen we apply economic sanction to them. We should financial help Palestine to set up their country.

Maintain peace in this world should be our government’s priority goal. Obama should change our position and negotiate with terrorists. For doing that it might need to do something to convince American. As a leader that is what he should do. For the benefit of our country a leader should be able to see things in further than the regular people do. That is what lead means.

Expansion on Global Scale

Wednesday, November 24th, 2010

A reader asked my opinions about American’s expansion on global scale. He raised a very important subject that was ignored by most of Americans. We usually care about problems that directly influence our life such as issue about employment and health insurance.

U.S government started their involvements to the global events in the Second World War. We were considered hero then for we helping countries that were being invaded. As a big and strong country we have obligations to take care of our global more. Expansion on the global scale is not always bad. It depends on what do you do, why do you do it and how do you do it.

Before 1980s most of the conflicts we involved were related to communist system. Communist country deprived individual’s properties and controlled people’s thinking. Fighting with them made us looked like worriers who fight for freedom and democracy. After communist countries collapsed in the Europe and after China opened its door to the Western world fights to the communist is no longer an issue. Expansion on global scale has some new content and it is changed without being noticed by American.

Our wrong doing started from our expansion in the Middle East. Conflicts over there relate to races, religions and territory rather than justice and evil. American should convince people to negotiate. However, all these years we support Israel in any circumstances including financial aid them. That stands make us become the target of terrorists. For the two buildings and two thousand people we lost in 9.11 we create two wars that have killed over one hundred thousand people. America taxpayers lost one trillion dollars in the wars. When we harm the others we benefit ourselves nothing.

We said nuclear weapons are dangers for mankind. However we own most of the nuclear missiles in the world. If we don’t use them why do we keep them? If we might use them why don’t we let the others have them? In the Middle East we determined which country can have the nuclear weapon and which country cannot have it. If they don’t listen what we said we apply economic sanctions to them including to punish their women and children. If they still don’t obey our orders we attack them. We might attack them one after another and convince the other countries to do so. We don’t know that in this world some people rather die than being humiliated. That is the situation that we created in the Middle East.

Uniting some countries to isolate one country is what we usually did on our expansion. In Europe we control NATO which represent 28 countries and set missiles bases again Russia. Meanwhile we complain that Russia is threatening the peace in Europe. In Asia we arrange military exercise in the sea around China once a while and made some Asia countries to join those exercises. This kind of exercises actually are provocation. In the 23th of November 2010, North Korean forced two hundred artillery shells at the South Korean island. The reason they did it was because South Korean ignored their warning and kept doing military exercise in their border. We should prohibit this kind of military exercises in any places because they are provocation that just like laughter at some one’s face. Particular when we united a few countries together to against one country. However U. S government did the same military exercise again from Nov 28th to Dec first and did it later with Japan.

We complain that missiles from China can reach our military bases and there for the Chinese is danger for us. Chinese missiles cannot reach our homeland. Can it? If we don’t set those bases all the way down to there, we would not feel threats. China has arguments about territory with it neighbors. That has nothing to do with right or wrong. American should stay away from their business unless they have fighting there. However, we cannot wait to involve – support some countries and against one country. These were what we did and how we did in the expansion on global scale.

Please see what the Chinese did about that. Chinese prime minister Wen declare that in the last twenty years, China has built more than 150 schools, almost 100 hospitals, 70 facilities for supplying water and 60 gym facilities in the developing countries. They sent out more than twenty thousand medical workers and provided service to a few hundred million patients. We can consider that is a kind of expansion on global scale because they obviously hope to enhance their influence in the world. However we cannot say that they are wrong even though they might get economic contracts from those countries in the processes.

Comparing with what the Chinese did our expansion is stupid and stink. I have mentioned what we did it and how we did in the expansion on global scale. Now I discuss our purpose of doing it. We are controlled by some dangers powers. For them the more conflicts this world has the more chances to sell weapons. I have this conclusion because I heard those people’s laughing that was recorded in a tape. When fire was swallowing our forest in the West Coast they said: “burn it baby!” Those are powerful people who control the price of oil in this country. They were happy because fire gave them excuse to raise the price. That meant in order to make money they don’t mind to put mankind in disasters. They need expansion on the global scale to meet their goal.

We should not only feel upset for what they do we should stop them as well. Prevent them from approaching our government. This is important because it is for saving lives. People are dying or will be killed by the weapons they sell. It is a tragedy that in our globe some people are so desire wars and we allow them to control our government.

A Plot Behind Free Trade

Saturday, November 20th, 2010

U. S politicians and some economists are continued to force RMB up. They make American believe that when products make in China are expensive jobs will be back. They fool us without feeling shame. Apparently American business companies will not come back but move to other countries when RMB is too high to bring in profit for them. Free trade is not practical and not fair in the very beginning because Americans are not ready to live in the stander that the other people live. Capitalists promote free trade for maximizing their profit. How can they give it up easily?

See how different the living standers are. Today, housing price in the cities of China is at least $250 per square foot. Someone compared the average price of ten kinds of merchandises, banana, tomato, egg, milk, meat and gas in Boston and Hangzhou, China. They found out that the price in China is 11.2 RMB and the price in the United States is 7.6 RMB. However, person’s average income in China is $4024 a year and in Boston is $32,255 a year. Wealth fare check plus food stamp that U.S government gives to our poorest people is $900 a month and the Chinese have less than $340 income a month. It is obvious that we cannot accept the salaries rate and living standers that the Chinese have. So, how can we expect that our products to beat the products make in China? If we can’t, why do we let our market sell any products that import to here? Free trade must result in job losing in U.S and the capitalists knew that clearly in the very beginning. They exploit foreign labors by playing with currency rate. They make profit in our market and walk away without creating jobs.

We force RMB up because the prices of their products are too low. Actually force them to increase price is easy. We can simply charge them tax. When the costs of their products are increased their market prices will be increased. Taxing them will bring in direct incomes for our government. Why we didn’t do it all these years? It is because increase importing tax will cut down our business companies’ profit as well. Forcing RMB up can let the Chinese take all the lost alone.

By printing dollars we can force RMB up and squeeze back all the profit they made. They got 5% to 10% profit in free trade and 65% of their foreign currency saving are dollars. When our dollars go down 30% they saving for dollar will loss 30%. In this way we can easily rob the whole world. That is why Germany said printing dollars is another way to control currency rate.

The Chinese government will be regret one day that they tied their people’s belts to exchange for papers – dollar. The Chinese are being exploited seriously. If we care about human right and we are fair we should encourage the Chinese businesses to increase salary but not force RMB up. Increase labor cost will bring up products prices. On that way products make in China cannot take over our market easily.

It is said the way that we calculating importing products is tricky. For example, the market price of one IPod is two hundred dollars in the United States. $ 160 is profit for the Apple Company and retail stores. About $35 are material cost shared by U.S and Japanese material suppliers. Only $4 is installing fee pay to the Chinese that cover the labor costs and their capital investment return. However, on the book it records that China imported a product that worth $150 to the United State. It hides a fact that the American Business companies are the biggest winners in the age of free trade. They let American blame on the Chinese. In the other hand, in 2008, U.S companies had 146.7 trillion dollars products sold directly in Chinese market and they were not recorded as exported products.

Actually we are not only have trade deficit with China we have deficit with 90 other countries in this world. According to data that the Chinese provided in 2010 their import from U.S is increased 36% compare with 2009 and 2009 is increase 16% compare with 2008. China is the second big imported country in the world. They point out that America lost about 100 billion dollars for we prohibiting high tech products export to China in the last 7 years. in 2001 18.3% of high tech products that China imported were from U.S and in 2008 only 7% are made in U.S.

On whole in the age of free trade American businesses are the biggest winners. Products from oversea double their earnings and they don’t have to pay tax for that. They make profit in our market and they don’t bother to create jobs. All they need is to set up a target to release American’s anger and the target is China.