BIP – Small Business Makes Big Achievement

November 30th, 2010  / Author: Pia Fields

In 2010, Nicolas set up a small business BIP produces some squinkies just like Beanie Babies and Zhu Zhu Pets . The price of his toys was 16 pieces for ten dollars. They have a few hundred kinds of different models and are the set of collection. In the beginning He was rejected by the big companies. He sent some samples to more than three hundred blog and get some referrals from them. he successfully got into the market finally. In the thanks giving of 2010, his products was sold out quickly. His small company Bip, has only 16 workers, gives us a big enlighten.
The Chinese economists believed that we should have different business structures in our society that exist as a pyramid. They don’t simply develop high tech. They keep traditional manufactures that create jobs as well. Please take a look for what we did in the United States.
Start from 1980s, we import household and office supplies from all over the world and give up most of our light industries. We did that because we believe high tech is more important for economic. We do have good development in IT fields. Huge fund was invested into the internet for just a concept or for some communication services. Google’s share price went up from about $85 to $ 800. We don’t care how many years we can have our investment back base on their dividend. After the Second World War, PE in the stocks usually was about 12 years. Today it takes 400 years to return the investments on some of our stocks. We don’t care about the traditional manufactures and create bulb in the stock market.
Now we have to face a reality that the economic index and stock index go up does not mean that the employment rate go up. Even today when we seriously short of jobs, when Obama thinking about create jobs the first thing he cares is green revolution – high tech research relate to new energy. He doesn’t realize that we need to rebuild our light industry to maintain jobs. For helping small businesses our government should construct low rent or free rental factory facilities for small businesses. We should schedule unemployed workers to work on there. I don’t know if my opinion is just a big talk until I read the achievement that Nicolas created. I know a small business can survive in our market and Americans can make low price products. That is exactly what I need to be sure. That means rebuilt our light industry is not just a dream. Our youths should step out to do it as well as our manufacturers. Our government should purchase things made in the United States first. Our high tech businesses should reinvest their charity funds to these kinds of light industry business. That is also help high tech companies themselves because people will purchase high tech products only when they have income.

Economic index, consumption and unemployment rate

November 30th, 2010  / Author: Pia Fields

From 2009 to 2010, Obama and his economists promoted stimulate package to raise employment rate. They give a few hundred billion dollars bail out to different kind of consumers and the unemployment rate was still at about 9% in the end of 2010. They simply believe that when merchandises were sold from the stores jobs will be increased in the market.
Please see how the Chinese economists consider unemployment issues. Around 2002, the labor cost in China was 3% to 5% of Japan and was 10% to 20% of Korea and Taiwan. 60% of their labors finished high school. The labor’s salary rate and quality gave them good advantage to attract foreign investments. However they still had a careful research about their job market. They found out that from 1999 to 2002 their economic increased 7% up each year and the unemployment was increased from 3.1% to 4%. They concluded that economic index increasing didn’t mean that employment would increase. The reason was that the high tech and modern equipments might give economic a big development but could not provide jobs as we expected.
They also noticed that jobs demanding usually were growth faster than jobs supply. Every year they could only create 7- 9 million jobs but the new job demanding are twenty to twenty- two million a year. They had a conclusion that for the stable of their society they need to have different kind of business structures that forms a shape of pyramids. They not only develop high tech but keep businesses that require labors. They even consider what should be their priority goal: developing economic or maintaining jobs.
Our economists, those teach in the top university of the world and those received Nobel price never make this kind of contemplates. They close their eyes to promote a one hundred year old economic theory. They tell people that when consumption goes up employment rate will go up. They don’t care that in the age of free trade we lost the control to our businesses and manufactures – the important chain connecting merchandise market and jobs market.
I once posted my comment in Paul Krugman’s blog discussing his consuming philosophy. I said this was the situation:
Base on scientists’ prediction, steam catching cold weather in the sky will turn to be rain. We desperate need rain. Our economists tell us to put the last water we have under the sunshine – turn that water to be steam and hope that the steam will become rain one day. They don’t care the rain will fall down at when and on where and they don’t mind that things they use to catch the rain have a big hole.
All these years our economists try to set a formula like Newton’s speed x time = distance. They believe that having a formula to explain every situation economic will be sure considered science. They try to be the leaders of our society. However, when things collapse they will walk away. They will say things collapse because people lose their trust to politicians. So that is a political issue not economic issue.
I am so harsh to the misleading they created because they made our president who is not smart enough to spent huge money to stimulate the consumption. They make the American suffer from another big lost after losing huge money in the wars of anti-terrorism and we cannot offer to take that kind of lost anymore.

Diabetes and Health Insurance Cost

November 26th, 2010  / Author: Pia Fields

Data shows in America 10% of health insurance is paid for diabetes treatments. The average medical cost of regular people is about $4,700 per year. However, the average cost for diabetic was over $11,000. Such a big difference caught my attention because in my mind we have no medicine to cure diabetes up to today. So under what kind of circumstance money was spent.

Beside genetic weaknesses reason of diabetes usually is related to the food we eat. Overeat, particular over eat too much sugar and starch can cause diabetes. If we control our diet and do more exercises diabetes can be improved. We might not cured full of it but we can at least keep our body’s function.

In another word the only person who can help diabetics are patients themselves. If they eat right they can hang there without cost that much health insurance fund. If they don’t control their diet that means they don’t care about their health. There for they are not deserve to be helped by health insurance fund. Either way let diabetics have unlimited treatment is not appropriately.

Set up health insurance quota is very important in case like this. Diabetics will control their diet carefully for their quota can be used up. They might give up treatments that are without curing effects. Right now we let them spend funds in the way they want to spend. It looks like it would be their lost if insurance companies are willing to pay the doctor fee and they don’t see the doctors. Doctors of course hope to collect as much money as they can. In the picture our doors are wide opened and real money, dollars by dollars, are being paid to so call diabetes treatments that actually have no curing effect.

Doctors usually recommend their patients to take the most expenses service. One of my friends told me that many years ago he had diabetes. Doctors convinced him to cut his leg or he would have troubles. He refused to do it no matter what. His legs carry him around for more 10 years after that. He was fine till the day he talked to me. He said he cannot imagine what kind of life quality he would have if he lost his leg.

It is said there is 15 million diabetics in the United States and another thirty to fifty million people are pre-diabetics. If every year each of them spent $6,000 more health insurance than the regular people the total extra cost will be 400 billion dollars. If in average they have diabetes for 10 years the total extra cost will be 4 trillion dollars. For that huge amount of money we have reason to reevaluate our insurance policies or our economic will collapse because the overload of our insurance premiums.

People might say I talking all these because my health is good. Actually my blood sugar is higher than normal as well and I did not control diet as what I suppose to do. However, I still believe it is no body else but my duty to take care of my health. We have no right to enjoy food and let the society take care of our obese.

Molester, Pervert, disgusting

November 25th, 2010  / Author: Pia Fields

According to the report in AM New York molester, pervert, and disgusting were the words that TSA screeners hear the most in their job area. For preventing the attacks from terrorist airport give full-body scans to all the air travelers. They physically search those who refused to be scanned and told the passengers that: You fight, you wait.

The new scanners can see through people’s body. Businessmen immediately invented special underwear and claimed that can protect peoples’ privacy. In the procedures a cancer survivor was covered in urine and a woman’s fake breast was taken off. This is a picture about our achievement as anti- terrorists. After losing all those soldiers’ lives and a half trillion dollars in the wars we don’t feel security in our homeland. That is why people were upset and refused to be scanned.

Just by taking a look we can tell that 99% of the passengers are not terrorists. However, we search them for the security reason. Terrorists sent out one more bomb we enforce our security procedures more by searching air travelers. Terrorists must have fun to see how Americans are raising their hands and being scanned. It proofs that their parcel bomb, fake bomb are powerful. Just by making a phone call they can give us a nightmare forever. If they choose the subway as their target we can’t stop them by scanning subway passengers. They can do many more things to hurt us if they want to.

Ten years of war cannot stop their attacks. It looks like the best way to stop them is to negotiate with them. From the beginning I believe that eliminating terrorists is not the way to solve the problem because they are backed up by religion and we cannot kill all of the Muslims disciples. Negotiation with them is not that impossible. The loss that the Japanese created in Pearl Harbor was much serious than what we lost in 9.11 and we work in alliance with them today. The Vietnam government fighting with us for many years. Ben Laden and Saddam Hussein once were our friends. Asking for negotiation might hurt our dignity. Thinking about how we once hurt their dignity we can balance ourselves. Tell them forget about what we have done and end the conflicts. In today’s day the natural disasters give mankind enough troubles we have no reason to fight each other and make our life tough.

By showing our sincerity we can release the terrorists in our jails. Terrorists have faith just like we have faith. Every time I read their faces I feel that they are not crazy. They are the people who can sit down with us and have a talk. If we don’t do things they do like they wouldn’t fight. We can tell Israel to stay in where the United Nations said they should stay at the time they set up their country. If they don’t listen we apply economic sanction to them. We should financial help Palestine to set up their country.

Maintain peace in this world should be our government’s priority goal. Obama should change our position and negotiate with terrorists. For doing that it might need to do something to convince American. As a leader that is what he should do. For the benefit of our country a leader should be able to see things in further than the regular people do. That is what lead means.

Expansion on Global Scale

November 24th, 2010  / Author: Pia Fields

A reader asked my opinions about American’s expansion on global scale. He raised a very important subject that was ignored by most of Americans. We usually care about problems that directly influence our life such as issue about employment and health insurance.

U.S government started their involvements to the global events in the Second World War. We were considered hero then for we helping countries that were being invaded. As a big and strong country we have obligations to take care of our global more. Expansion on the global scale is not always bad. It depends on what do you do, why do you do it and how do you do it.

Before 1980s most of the conflicts we involved were related to communist system. Communist country deprived individual’s properties and controlled people’s thinking. Fighting with them made us looked like worriers who fight for freedom and democracy. After communist countries collapsed in the Europe and after China opened its door to the Western world fights to the communist is no longer an issue. Expansion on global scale has some new content and it is changed without being noticed by American.

Our wrong doing started from our expansion in the Middle East. Conflicts over there relate to races, religions and territory rather than justice and evil. American should convince people to negotiate. However, all these years we support Israel in any circumstances including financial aid them. That stands make us become the target of terrorists. For the two buildings and two thousand people we lost in 9.11 we create two wars that have killed over one hundred thousand people. America taxpayers lost one trillion dollars in the wars. When we harm the others we benefit ourselves nothing.

We said nuclear weapons are dangers for mankind. However we own most of the nuclear missiles in the world. If we don’t use them why do we keep them? If we might use them why don’t we let the others have them? In the Middle East we determined which country can have the nuclear weapon and which country cannot have it. If they don’t listen what we said we apply economic sanctions to them including to punish their women and children. If they still don’t obey our orders we attack them. We might attack them one after another and convince the other countries to do so. We don’t know that in this world some people rather die than being humiliated. That is the situation that we created in the Middle East.

Uniting some countries to isolate one country is what we usually did on our expansion. In Europe we control NATO which represent 28 countries and set missiles bases again Russia. Meanwhile we complain that Russia is threatening the peace in Europe. In Asia we arrange military exercise in the sea around China once a while and made some Asia countries to join those exercises. This kind of exercises actually are provocation. In the 23th of November 2010, North Korean forced two hundred artillery shells at the South Korean island. The reason they did it was because South Korean ignored their warning and kept doing military exercise in their border. We should prohibit this kind of military exercises in any places because they are provocation that just like laughter at some one’s face. Particular when we united a few countries together to against one country. However U. S government did the same military exercise again from Nov 28th to Dec first and did it later with Japan.

We complain that missiles from China can reach our military bases and there for the Chinese is danger for us. Chinese missiles cannot reach our homeland. Can it? If we don’t set those bases all the way down to there, we would not feel threats. China has arguments about territory with it neighbors. That has nothing to do with right or wrong. American should stay away from their business unless they have fighting there. However, we cannot wait to involve – support some countries and against one country. These were what we did and how we did in the expansion on global scale.

Please see what the Chinese did about that. Chinese prime minister Wen declare that in the last twenty years, China has built more than 150 schools, almost 100 hospitals, 70 facilities for supplying water and 60 gym facilities in the developing countries. They sent out more than twenty thousand medical workers and provided service to a few hundred million patients. We can consider that is a kind of expansion on global scale because they obviously hope to enhance their influence in the world. However we cannot say that they are wrong even though they might get economic contracts from those countries in the processes.

Comparing with what the Chinese did our expansion is stupid and stink. I have mentioned what we did it and how we did in the expansion on global scale. Now I discuss our purpose of doing it. We are controlled by some dangers powers. For them the more conflicts this world has the more chances to sell weapons. I have this conclusion because I heard those people’s laughing that was recorded in a tape. When fire was swallowing our forest in the West Coast they said: “burn it baby!” Those are powerful people who control the price of oil in this country. They were happy because fire gave them excuse to raise the price. That meant in order to make money they don’t mind to put mankind in disasters. They need expansion on the global scale to meet their goal.

We should not only feel upset for what they do we should stop them as well. Prevent them from approaching our government. This is important because it is for saving lives. People are dying or will be killed by the weapons they sell. It is a tragedy that in our globe some people are so desire wars and we allow them to control our government.